JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 26, 2000

A- de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant David Andres Patiño Garcia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que la Sala de Casación Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia es la autoridad competente para decidir el conflicto de competencia de orden territorial surgido entre un Tribunal de Medellín y un Juez de Familia de Bogotá, toda vez que es el superior jerárquico común.

En consecuencia, se ordenó el envío del expediente a la mencionada Sala para lo de su competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR que la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia es la autoridad competente para decidir el conflicto de competencia de orden territorial surgido entre el Tribunal Superior de Medellin y el Juez
  2. Primero. de Familia de Santafe de Bogota.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR el envio del expediente a la Sala de Casacion Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para lo de su competencia.
  4. Tercero. ORDENAR que, por medio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, se remita copia de esta providencia a las Salas Jurisdiccionales Disciplinarias de los Consejos Seccionales de la Judicatura de Antioquia y Cundinamarca, para los fines anotados en la parte motiva.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.